The Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model: Evaluate User Training

Microsoft Dynamics 365 (D365) training is critical for successful implementations in business applications, helping users adopt features like CRM modules, ERP processes, or Power Platform integrations. However, measuring its effectiveness requires a structured approach.

The Kirkpatrick Model, a four-level framework for training evaluation, is ideal for this, as it progresses from immediate feedback to organisational impact.

By applying it to D365 training, organisations can identify gaps, refine programs, and demonstrate ROI—especially in complex ERP/CRM environments where user adoption directly affects productivity and data accuracy.

In this post, we will learn how to apply each level, with practical examples tailored to D365 scenarios like sales team training on customer engagement tools or finance teams learning supply chain modules.

The Kirkpatrick Model

The Kirkpatrick Model is one of the most widely used frameworks for evaluating the effectiveness of training programs. Developed by Donald Kirkpatrick in 1959, it provides a structured approach to assess training at multiple levels, helping organisations measure not just immediate outcomes but also long-term impact. https://www.devlinpeck.com/content/kirkpatrick-model-evaluation

Originally introduced in Kirkpatrick's doctoral dissertation and later refined through his work, the model has been adopted across industries, from corporate learning and development (L&D) to healthcare and education. https://trainingindustry.com/wiki/measurement-and-analytics/the-kirkpatrick-model/

The model consists of four progressive levels:

1. Reaction

2. Learning

3. Behavior

4. Results

These levels build on each other, starting with participant feedback and escalating to organisational outcomes.

Level 1: Reaction – Gauging User Satisfaction

This level assesses participants' immediate perceptions of the training: Was it engaging, relevant, and well-delivered? In D365 contexts, where users often face steep learning curves with customizable interfaces and cloud-based features, capturing reactions helps refine delivery methods early.

• How to Apply:

Use post-session surveys or feedback forms via tools like Microsoft Forms integrated into the D365 ecosystem. Ask questions such as: "How relevant was the session on configuring workflows to your daily role?" or "Rate the instructor's clarity on a scale of 1-10."

• D365 Example:

During a workshop on D365 Finance and Operations, participants might rate the hands-on demos highly for interactivity but note that the pace was too fast for non-technical users. This feedback could lead to adjustments like shorter modules or more breakout sessions.

• Best Practices:

Aim for 80%+ positive responses. In ERP training, low satisfaction often stems from jargon overload, so incorporate audience analysis upfront. Metrics here don't prove learning but flag issues like poor virtual delivery in remote D365 rollouts.

Level 2: Learning – Measuring Knowledge and Skill Acquisition

Here, evaluate what participants learned: Did they gain the necessary knowledge, skills, or attitudes? For D365, this is crucial as training covers technical skills like data modelling in Power BI or process automation in Power Automate.

• How to Apply:

Conduct pre- and post-training assessments, such as quizzes, simulations, or certification-style tests through Microsoft Learn paths. Compare scores to quantify gains, e.g., a 30% improvement in understanding entity relationships.

• D365 Example:

In a sales training program, pre-tests might show low familiarity with D365 Customer Insights. Post-training, participants complete a simulation where they build a customer journey map, demonstrating mastery. If scores lag, it signals a need for more targeted content, like role-based modules for marketers vs. salespeople.

• Best Practices:

Use blended methods—e.g., e-learning for basics and labs for advanced topics—to accommodate diverse learners. Integrate with CRM data to track learning against user profiles. This level confirms if the training transferred D365-specific knowledge, but doesn't yet show on-the-job application.

Level 3: Behaviour – Observing On-the-Job Application

This level checks if learned skills translate to workplace changes: Are users applying D365 tools effectively? In ERP systems like D365, behaviour shifts might include faster invoice processing or better data entry compliance, but barriers like system access or resistance to change can affect this level.

• How to Apply:

Gather data 3-6 months post-training via observations, manager interviews, self-assessments, or D365 analytics (e.g., usage logs from telemetry). Track metrics like adoption rates or error reductions.

• D365 Example:

After training on D365 Supply Chain Management, evaluate if warehouse staff now use mobile apps for real-time inventory updates instead of manual spreadsheets. Manager feedback might reveal a 20% increase in efficiency, but if not, follow-up coaching could address gaps. In CRM scenarios, check if sales reps are logging interactions more consistently, leading to improved pipeline accuracy.

• Best Practices:

Reinforce with job aids or micro-learning boosters. Link to HRIS or operations data for objective insights, as suggested in corporate training integrations. This level bridges training to performance, revealing if D365 adoption is sticking.

Level 4: Results – Assessing Organisational Impact

The final level measures broader outcomes: Did the training drive business results? For D365 implementations, this ties to KPIs like cost savings, revenue growth, or compliance improvements, proving the program's value.

• How to Apply:

Analyse pre- and post-training business metrics using D365 dashboards or external tools. Calculate ROI by comparing training costs against gains, isolating effects through control groups or trend analysis.

• D365 Example:

Post-training on D365 Commerce, measure a 15% rise in customer retention from better personalisation features, or reduced operational costs from streamlined procurement. If UAT error rates drop by 25%, it indicates effective knowledge transfer. In ERP contexts, integrate evaluation with CRM/ERP data to link training to outcomes like faster month-end closes.

• Best Practices:

Start with Level 4 goals in mind during planning, as recommended for D365 projects. Challenges include attributing results solely to training, so use data from multiple sources, like financial reports.

Implementation Tips for D365 Training

To fully leverage Kirkpatrick in D365:

• Design Backwards: Align training with business objectives from the start, using Microsoft's guidance on training plans.

• Leverage Technology: Integrate with D365 tools like Power BI for dashboards tracking all levels, or AI-assisted evaluations for behaviour analysis.

• Overcome Challenges: Higher levels are resource-intensive, so phase evaluations involve stakeholders. In ERP training, focus on bespoke programs to address biases like expert overconfidence.

• Expected Benefits: Organisations using this model report up to 50% better ROI in training, with improved user adoption in systems like D365.

By applying the Kirkpatrick Model, D365 training evolves from a one-off event to a measurable driver of success. If you're implementing this in a specific scenario, consider starting with a pilot program to test evaluations.

Summary - Integrating the Kirkpatrick Model into LEAD365™ Training Framework

LEAD365™ framework is a modular approach to Dynamics 365 (D365) training, aligning seamlessly with Microsoft's Success by Design methodology through its four stages: Learn, Engage, Adopt, and Drive. It emphasises embedding learning throughout the project lifecycle to boost adoption and ROI, which incorporates the Kirkpatrick Training Evaluation Model.

The Kirkpatrick Model's four levels, Reaction, Learning, Behaviour, and Results, provide a structured way to measure training effectiveness, ensuring your methodology isn't just delivering content but driving measurable outcomes.

By integrating Kirkpatrick, we add a layer of evaluation to validate and refine LEAD365™, turning it into a data-driven powerhouse. This enhances benefits for Microsoft Partners, CSPs, ISVs, and end-users, such as protecting margins, reducing hypercare, and proving client satisfaction.

If you want to learn more about how we can help your team master Dynamics applications, book a discovery call.

Partner Training Call

30min

Book Now